Crimes to Courts banner
Crimes to Courts avatar
Crimes to Courts
@crimestocourts
訂閱數14萬
總播放2.9億
影片數639
Crimes to Courts發布於 2026年5月19日 上午03:380:56
Citizen Releases Dog on Cops Who Refused to Leave in Florida thumbnail

Citizen Releases Dog on Cops Who Refused to Leave in Florida

19 天前長尾期
first amendment audittyrant copcop ownedid refusalpolice accountabilityshorts
發布時間
2026年5月19日 上午03:38
影片時長
0:56
影片類型
新聞政治
頻道地區
美國
發布時間判斷
發布時間判斷資料不足
當前頻道仍缺少完整的歷史發布時間模式,建議繼續累積頻道資料後再觀察最佳時段命中情況。
商業化判斷
暫無明確商業化標籤
當前影片更適合從播放增速、互動品質和同主題競爭情況來判斷後續變現空間。
動作建議
優先觀察持續成長能力
當前影片基礎條件較完整,建議繼續觀察近7日播放和收入是否穩定抬升,再決定是否擴寫成系列內容。
播放量
288.4萬
按讚數
15萬
留言數
5138
日預估收入
-
累計預估收入
$92.29 - $369.17
RPM 區間
$0.03 - $0.13
1日漲播放
0
7日漲播放
0
1日漲按讚
0
7日漲按讚
0
1日漲留言
0
7日漲留言
0
速度分
0%
主題聚類
first amendment audit
影片說明
Citizen Releases Dog on Cops Who Refused to Leave in Florida On May 23 2023 two police officers arrived at a homeowner property on Tanglewood Drive in Florida to deliver a criminal trespass warning on behalf of his elderly neighbor. What followed is one of the wildest police encounters ever caught on camera. Instead of complying this Florida man flipped the entire situation and trespassed the cops from HIS property. The officers were there to issue a criminal trespass warning after a dispute between the man and his elderly neighbor. The man immediately demanded names and badge numbers. Officer Hernandez Badge 535 and his partner Badge 520 identified themselves. The homeowner acknowledged the warning agreed never to return to the neighbor property and told them that is all you need now get off my property. But these officers refused to leave. Despite being asked SIX times to vacate despite clearly posted No Trespassing signs and despite being told he would not answer questions without an attorney present the officers stayed. The man cited the Fourth Amendment warned them about losing qualified immunity and told them their badges and guns are not a crown. When the officers still would not leave the homeowner gave them a 30 second countdown then closed the gate and released his dog. The officers finally backed away and the man made it clear he would defend his property. The man in this video is John Stuart a Florida resident who uploaded the original footage to YouTube on May 23 2023. The video went viral with over 38000 views on his channel alone and hundreds of thousands more across police accountability and cop watch reaction channels nationwide. As of 2026 no public lawsuit filing or settlement has been confirmed from this incident. No criminal charges were filed against the homeowner. The officers completed delivery of the trespass warning by leaving it at the gate and eventually exited after the dog was released. Stuart has not posted legal updates regarding civil action against the department. The case remains a widely shared example of a citizen asserting constitutional rights during a police encounter on private property in the USA. KEY LEGAL POINTS IN THIS VIDEO A homeowner has the right to order anyone off their property including police officers when no crime is being committed and no warrant is present. Criminal trespass warnings are civil documents and delivering one does not authorize law enforcement to remain on private property against the owners wishes. Officers who violate constitutional rights risk losing qualified immunity. The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. No Trespassing signs serve as legal notice under Florida Statute 810.09. The Fifth Amendment protects your right to remain silent during any police encounter on your property. • Drop your thoughts in the comments. Was this man right to stand his ground or did the officers overstep. Let us know what you think. LIKE this video if you support police accountability. SUBSCRIBE and hit the bell for more crimes to courts content. SHARE this to spread awareness about your rights. Disclaimer: This video should not be construed as legal advice. We are not attorneys. Seek legal counsel if you believe you are a victim of police misconduct. Facts presented are based on available information and are not indicative of personal opinions. Notice: We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism comment review and news reporting which constitute fair use as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding Sections 106 and 106A the fair use of a copyrighted work for criticism comment review and news reporting. KEYWORDS news, cops, bodycam, know your rights, police encounter, first amendment audit, cop watch, audit the police, law enforcement, tyrant cop, police misconduct, police overreach, police accountability, constitutional rights, 1st amendment, 4th amendment, 5th amendment, 14th amendment, civil rights lawsuit, traffic stop, Detroit police, DPD, Michigan, USA, retaliation, qualified immunity, cop gets owned, copwatch, first amendment auditor HASHTAGS #firstamendmentaudit #policeaccountability #knowyourrights #auditthepolice #copgetsowned #tyrantcop #policemisconduct #bodycam #4thamendment #copaudit #lawenforcement #policeoverreach #copwatch #constitutionalrights #firstamendment #1stamendment #audittheaudit #cops #lackluster #floridapolice #firstamendmentauditor #detroitpolice #michigan #DPD #trafficstop
同主題推薦
圍繞當前主題繼續看高相關影片,幫助判斷選題空間和內容形態。
主題:first amendment audit
暫無足夠的同主題影片資料。
影片常見問題

以下問題聚焦這支影片能提供哪些洞察、收益為何是估算值,以及如何用它做內容研究。

這個影片頁能看出什麼?

你可以查看觀看、按讚、留言、RPM 與收益估算、發布時間、主題標籤、相關影片以及所屬頻道背景,用來判斷內容表現與後續選題方向。

為什麼 RPM 和收益只是估算值?

實際收入會受到廣告填充率、受眾地區、季節性、廣告需求與是否開啟營利等因素影響,因此這些數字更適合拿來看趨勢與做橫向比較。

怎麼用這個影片頁做內容研究?

建議搭配發布時間、主題標籤、相關影片與頻道歷史內容,觀察哪些題材、節奏與發布時段更容易帶來觀看與商業化表現。